<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Platform Jumping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/</link>
	<description>social capital, trust agents, all that jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Sawh</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-202943</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Sawh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-202943</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong when you say context imprints either a high or low status on each project. The most successful  projects combine elements of both. I&#039;m doubtful culture is so easily separated nowadays.  And that&#039;s a good thing! 

 FWIW, one mag offers highbrow/lowbrow on one axis and despicable/brilliant on the other. 


 Take swanky restaurant menus, you&#039;ll see words like: planko, encrusted, jasmine, saffron.   They&#039;re priming you to pay top-dollar by convincing that it&#039;s an exotic, unique experience.  

 Still, a Zagat rating in a city like Montreal is a distinguishing feature in a v. competitive field.  

If you hear folks like me from the middle-class talk about their dishes at restaurants, often it&#039;s about their taste.    The well-off chat about the presentation.      

Yet, the best and most successful chefs have developed concepts which blend the high-brow and middle-brow. Take Chiptole&#039;s focus on sustainable food or Danny Meyer&#039;s Shake Shack in NYC: top quality ingredients + comfort food.  BTW, both rank well in Zagat.   

This is  oversimplified but, hope you see where I&#039;m going.

The power of the specialists to build transparent hierarchies for the public is where the opportunity often lies.   Just ask Tim and Nina Zagat.

Would like to see a post on creative destruction and confidence as a follow-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re wrong when you say context imprints either a high or low status on each project. The most successful  projects combine elements of both. I&#8217;m doubtful culture is so easily separated nowadays.  And that&#8217;s a good thing! </p>
<p> FWIW, one mag offers highbrow/lowbrow on one axis and despicable/brilliant on the other. </p>
<p> Take swanky restaurant menus, you&#8217;ll see words like: planko, encrusted, jasmine, saffron.   They&#8217;re priming you to pay top-dollar by convincing that it&#8217;s an exotic, unique experience.  </p>
<p> Still, a Zagat rating in a city like Montreal is a distinguishing feature in a v. competitive field.  </p>
<p>If you hear folks like me from the middle-class talk about their dishes at restaurants, often it&#8217;s about their taste.    The well-off chat about the presentation.      </p>
<p>Yet, the best and most successful chefs have developed concepts which blend the high-brow and middle-brow. Take Chiptole&#8217;s focus on sustainable food or Danny Meyer&#8217;s Shake Shack in NYC: top quality ingredients + comfort food.  BTW, both rank well in Zagat.   </p>
<p>This is  oversimplified but, hope you see where I&#8217;m going.</p>
<p>The power of the specialists to build transparent hierarchies for the public is where the opportunity often lies.   Just ask Tim and Nina Zagat.</p>
<p>Would like to see a post on creative destruction and confidence as a follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Ness</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173836</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173836</guid>
		<description>Context is everything. It is disappointing when people value crap because of the name attached to it and dismiss good or interesting for the same reason. But it happens.

Not to discredit the point, but there is another dynamic going on with the violinist. What percent of the people walking past would have paid $100 to see him play on stage? It is likely that very few of the people passing by had the experience to judge what they were listening to nor would they have paid money for it had they been told who he was. There is also the issue of attentiveness, but that can wait.

Having one billion friends on Facebook may make you feel popular, but if it doesn&#039;t help accomplish an objective, it has no practical value. When it comes to credibility, the quality of the audience usually trumps the size of the stage.

Thanks for letting me borrow on your credibility.

Lance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Context is everything. It is disappointing when people value crap because of the name attached to it and dismiss good or interesting for the same reason. But it happens.</p>
<p>Not to discredit the point, but there is another dynamic going on with the violinist. What percent of the people walking past would have paid $100 to see him play on stage? It is likely that very few of the people passing by had the experience to judge what they were listening to nor would they have paid money for it had they been told who he was. There is also the issue of attentiveness, but that can wait.</p>
<p>Having one billion friends on Facebook may make you feel popular, but if it doesn&#8217;t help accomplish an objective, it has no practical value. When it comes to credibility, the quality of the audience usually trumps the size of the stage.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me borrow on your credibility.</p>
<p>Lance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Satell</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173720</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Satell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173720</guid>
		<description>Julien,

It&#039;s a very good point, but raises another question.  Why do Digital Media People fail to grasp that context is important for advertising too?  

Instead of whining about low ad rates I wish more people in the Digital sphere thought about why marketers are willing to pay more for an association with branded content, even for the same audience.  

There is a reason that you are more likely to see drug dealers at a rock concert than at a university library.

- Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very good point, but raises another question.  Why do Digital Media People fail to grasp that context is important for advertising too?  </p>
<p>Instead of whining about low ad rates I wish more people in the Digital sphere thought about why marketers are willing to pay more for an association with branded content, even for the same audience.  </p>
<p>There is a reason that you are more likely to see drug dealers at a rock concert than at a university library.</p>
<p>- Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan McCormack</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173696</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173696</guid>
		<description>Razor-sharp insights and a perfect analogy. I had not heard of the Joshua Bell &quot;experiment&quot; in DC, but now that I have, I&#039;ll never forget it.

Reading your post makes me think of the endless stream of &quot;magic formulas&quot; to get Twitter followers (supposedly to increase one&#039;s influence). Without exception, every one of these simplistic formulas or top 10 lists fails to mention context, even if they do have some useful ideas. 

Even if you have the most insightful, funny, life-altering tweets that follow every &quot;rule,&quot; it probably won&#039;t matter unless your messages are delivered in a meaningful context. This may mean having a nucleus of influential followers, or it may mean using keywords or hashtags intelligently to get your ideas seen. Until you have the right context, though, no one is seeing that great content, and you might as well be playing your violin in the subway station.

Thanks for starting my Sunday right and providing some tasty food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Razor-sharp insights and a perfect analogy. I had not heard of the Joshua Bell &#8220;experiment&#8221; in DC, but now that I have, I&#8217;ll never forget it.</p>
<p>Reading your post makes me think of the endless stream of &#8220;magic formulas&#8221; to get Twitter followers (supposedly to increase one&#8217;s influence). Without exception, every one of these simplistic formulas or top 10 lists fails to mention context, even if they do have some useful ideas. </p>
<p>Even if you have the most insightful, funny, life-altering tweets that follow every &#8220;rule,&#8221; it probably won&#8217;t matter unless your messages are delivered in a meaningful context. This may mean having a nucleus of influential followers, or it may mean using keywords or hashtags intelligently to get your ideas seen. Until you have the right context, though, no one is seeing that great content, and you might as well be playing your violin in the subway station.</p>
<p>Thanks for starting my Sunday right and providing some tasty food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve cunningham</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173692</link>
		<dc:creator>steve cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173692</guid>
		<description>Julien - what a great post.  Context is HUGE.  Example - I&#039;ve been listening to you, Mitch, Chris, Chris, Hugh and CC on Media Hacks for a while now.  I love the content, and it&#039;s obvious that you guys know your &quot;stuff&quot;.  And yesterday I saw Mitch share the stage with Tom Peters and Marcus Buckingham in front of 2,000 people.  Big leap.  Ditto for you and Chris&#039; book getting on the NY Times list.  Big leap.  

We have, and always will, rely on other people&#039;s judgments to validate our own.  That&#039;s why I don&#039;t think these stories, especially the one about Joshua Bell, should be surprising.  I love classical music, and I would have walked right by him too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien &#8211; what a great post.  Context is HUGE.  Example &#8211; I&#8217;ve been listening to you, Mitch, Chris, Chris, Hugh and CC on Media Hacks for a while now.  I love the content, and it&#8217;s obvious that you guys know your &#8220;stuff&#8221;.  And yesterday I saw Mitch share the stage with Tom Peters and Marcus Buckingham in front of 2,000 people.  Big leap.  Ditto for you and Chris&#8217; book getting on the NY Times list.  Big leap.  </p>
<p>We have, and always will, rely on other people&#8217;s judgments to validate our own.  That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t think these stories, especially the one about Joshua Bell, should be surprising.  I love classical music, and I would have walked right by him too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Feldman, JobWhiz Executive Talent Agent</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173690</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Feldman, JobWhiz Executive Talent Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173690</guid>
		<description>At about 7PM eastern tonight Oct 17th CNN live was interviewing at BlogWorld09. Someone commented that the schism between traditional and new media is starting to blur. CNN&#039;s reporter said, &quot;It&#039;s all media&quot; and it doesn&#039;t matter anymore which type of media. Is the medium still the message? Would love to know what others think about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At about 7PM eastern tonight Oct 17th CNN live was interviewing at BlogWorld09. Someone commented that the schism between traditional and new media is starting to blur. CNN&#8217;s reporter said, &#8220;It&#8217;s all media&#8221; and it doesn&#8217;t matter anymore which type of media. Is the medium still the message? Would love to know what others think about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonybordonaro</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173689</link>
		<dc:creator>tonybordonaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173689</guid>
		<description>I so agree ...I was in a band for many years and we had modest success...a Capitol record contract and some good gigs ...and that got us far for many years ...the fact that they said we were good enough to sign ...it gave us the right to charge more and people happily did...I know there are many great talents out there today that get overlooked just because they dont have the platform that tells the rest of us &quot;give them a listen&quot;.... thanks for your story ...great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so agree &#8230;I was in a band for many years and we had modest success&#8230;a Capitol record contract and some good gigs &#8230;and that got us far for many years &#8230;the fact that they said we were good enough to sign &#8230;it gave us the right to charge more and people happily did&#8230;I know there are many great talents out there today that get overlooked just because they dont have the platform that tells the rest of us &#8220;give them a listen&#8221;&#8230;. thanks for your story &#8230;great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173680</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the words. I found this page from a Google Alert on Street Performing. I&#039;m so happy. Great story, thanks for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the words. I found this page from a Google Alert on Street Performing. I&#8217;m so happy. Great story, thanks for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Quirk</title>
		<link>http://inoveryourhead.net/platform-jumping/#comment-173674</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inoveryourhead.net/?p=1067#comment-173674</guid>
		<description>Julien, that is a crackerjack post.

I first read about Joshua Bell&#039;s performance in the book Sway by Ori and Rom Brafman. It made me realize how hard true objectivity is to practice. All of us, no matter what our backgrounds are the products of life&#039;s circumstances. In order to be able to cope with the sprawling mass of information out there, we take mental shortcuts to keep ourselves sane. An example of this is sub-conscious racial profiling by people who would otherwise claim to not have a racist bone in their body. In the case of Bell, people have preconceived notions as to how good a street performer can really be, as such Bell received only passing interest despite being world-class.

The way you have framed it as borrowing credibility from anothers&#039; platform is spot on. It&#039;s become a cliche, but the only thing scarce on the web is attention. Therefore, in order to capture others attention, one must make it easy for their readers to make the necessary shortcuts (recommendations, testimonials) in proving that their content is of real use. Expecting others to do so on their own is too much to ask when there are a million and one other blogs to read.

Keep up the great work - I&#039;m 50 pages into Trust Agents - it&#039;s a gem!

Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julien, that is a crackerjack post.</p>
<p>I first read about Joshua Bell&#8217;s performance in the book Sway by Ori and Rom Brafman. It made me realize how hard true objectivity is to practice. All of us, no matter what our backgrounds are the products of life&#8217;s circumstances. In order to be able to cope with the sprawling mass of information out there, we take mental shortcuts to keep ourselves sane. An example of this is sub-conscious racial profiling by people who would otherwise claim to not have a racist bone in their body. In the case of Bell, people have preconceived notions as to how good a street performer can really be, as such Bell received only passing interest despite being world-class.</p>
<p>The way you have framed it as borrowing credibility from anothers&#8217; platform is spot on. It&#8217;s become a cliche, but the only thing scarce on the web is attention. Therefore, in order to capture others attention, one must make it easy for their readers to make the necessary shortcuts (recommendations, testimonials) in proving that their content is of real use. Expecting others to do so on their own is too much to ask when there are a million and one other blogs to read.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work &#8211; I&#8217;m 50 pages into Trust Agents &#8211; it&#8217;s a gem!</p>
<p>Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

